The G20 Supremacy: Fact or Wishful Thinking?

The G20 meeting in Pittsburgh has ended with a grandiose self promotion of the event and its future relevance. The participants declared the meeting from now on to be the world’s principal economic gathering. But designation alone is not enough. The real question is how the impact of the meeting will change.

Time was, that the host of an international summit could use the meeting to not only discuss pertinent issues but also initiate policy action. Such potential was also there for the Pittsburgh meeting. For example, as President Obama raised a global trade vision for economic recovery, job creation, and environmental sustainability, he could have demonstrated a commitment to these principles through the announcement of promising policies.

Yet, the Obama Administration’s decision to invoke safeguards and impose tariffs on Chinese tire imports dealt a major blow to such a vision. Many U.S. trading partners were hoping that ‘Buy America’ provisions of the economic stimulus legislation and the U.S. failure to live up to its NAFTA obligations on Mexican trucking were products of an increasingly trade-phobic Congress. Widespread expectations that the Administration could keep legislators on a leash, were far from met. The recent decision against tire imports from China was President Obama’s own, driven by union pressure. It reveals more precisely and loudly than any trade policy speech ever could, the details of the direction of U.S. policy.

It says that the U.S. now views the rules-based global trading system, which successive U.S. Administrations—both Republican and Democrat—placed at the center of U.S. global economic policy, as outdated and expendable. This takes place despite of the fact that rules are in large measure responsible for the post war global economic success.

It says that the U.S. has now created a subclass of economic interests. Manufacturers of auto parts, exporters of poultry, producers of aircraft are now at constant risk of international retribution. For example, in retaliation of the tire decision the Chinese are now threatening not to buy U.S. goods which are in demand and competitive. Motivated workers in successful industries now have their legitimate interests subrogated to the trade agenda of the major U.S. unions.

It says that the U.S. had its fingers crossed when signing on to the anti-protectionist pledge, and raises real doubts about future adherence.

It says that the “Yes we can” Administration has lost confidence in the American model of competitiveness.

China is absolutely right to choose this ground to challenge the U.S. on protectionism. While trade lawyers can argue the letter of the WTO commitment—it is absolutely clear that the spirit of the Safeguards Agreement has been violated in this case.

Unquestionably, there are numerous issues on which the U.S. can challenge China’s approach to trade—including subsidies, exchange rate issues, disregard for intellectual property rights and denial of equal treatment. But a safeguard action addresses none of these. It doesn’t identify any fault with the Chinese—only with the ability of U.S. workers to compete. When faced with competition from Chinese tire producers, the U.S. could not point to dumping or government supports, so the Administration went to the “no we can’t” option.

Larry Summers has said that the long term formula for U.S. economic recovery will be to become an export oriented economy. To do that, U.S. products will have to compete aggressively and successfully with other countries for world markets. Trading partners will also need to be convinced to open up their markets to international products.

There will have to be a reversal of the deepening slide into protectionism heralded by the tire decision. America needs to participate in a trade agenda that gets the world working again. Only then will the next G 20 meetings be relevant and of impact.

43 thoughts on “The G20 Supremacy: Fact or Wishful Thinking?

  1. Someone necessarily lend a hand to make severely posts I might
    state. This is the first time I frequented your website page and
    up to now? I amazed with the research you made to make this actual submit incredible.
    Excellent process!

  2. Well-written piece. I just passed this on 10/17/2016 to a classmate who’s been involved in a little research of her own on this subject. To show their appreciation, she just bought me dinner! So, let me express my gratitude by saying: Thank you for the meal!

  3. My spouse and i have been quite thankful when John managed to carry out his analysis with the precious recommendations he discovered using your web pages. It’s not at all simplistic to simply find yourself making a gift of tips and hints that many the rest may have been selling. And we all keep in mind we have got the website owner to be grateful to for this. The most important illustrations you’ve made, the easy site menu, the relationships you make it easier to instill – it’s got many powerful, and it’s letting our son in addition to us understand the content is interesting, and that is highly indispensable. Thanks for all!

  4. Thanks , I have recently been searching for information about this topic for a while and yours is the best I’ve came upon till now. But, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you sure about the supply?

  5. Sweet blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks

  6. Dear Prof.Czinkota,

    as we know, you are fighting with a real punch for free Trade and for the sake of the United States. However, I am afraid, even with your courage and advocacy – its over. The States are History – only everybody is too polite to mention this, and the States by themselves are unwilling to see it.

    It is not the issue any more, whether tires may be imported into the States or not. Sure, you can annoy the Chinese with that – a doubtful triumph. The States have lost their heart, the ideas are at an end, the believe in oneself and the competitiveness is worn out. Shouting ‘Yes we can’ don’t substitute.

    The USA in gatherings like G20 reminds me of a movie about an aged Hollywood Star from the time of silent films. One day she did not like any more what she saw in the mirror. So she crashed every mirror in the house, kicked out the party-guests, never invited anybody any more. She just lived inside her wonderful house dreaming about former times, acting in roles of her big successes. Sometimes she called ‘Hollywood’ to tell them what to do and indeed her glimmer was still bright enough that somebody did answer the phone.

    Although this movie was one of the best film of its times, the audience did know from the beginning, that this is a sentimental, morbid melodrama. Time has gone by.

    Therefore, I hope that the Chinese – in their polite manner – will donate one or more additional pinball to the States to provide the chance to stand down with dignity in time.

    You never know, perhaps Bollywood is making a melancholic movie out of this.

Leave a Reply