When President Trump attended the G20 meeting in Hamburg, Germany, the aspects publicly reported were mainly uncontrolled demonstrators, burning Porsche cars and police at the end of their rope. Few benefits were attributed to the meeting. That is incorrect.
Consumers in the world accept European products because of the strong quality tradition. However, regardless of heritage’s importance, European industry is also an excellent example of the path the European companies follow in adapting to the future challenges; in doing so they create jobs and business opportunities for people in the EU states.
Over the next twenty years, the share of European growth will reduce to 10 per cent of the global, i.e. about 90 per cent of the world’s growth will happen outside of the European Union’s borders.
Therefore, the first lesson, Karel De Gucht, European Commissioner for Trade underlined, is that the industry’s “target market” is the global economy and markets. Knowing the advantages of the European Single Market, the companies expect something similar in the outside world. That’s not going to happen; and more European companies are obliged to meet global challenges.
The second lesson is competing on quality, as products and services’ quality is becoming ever more important to export success. Producing high-value added goods is essential for any developed economy as high-value goods which incorporate skills and experience allow for well-paying jobs for people with such skills and that experience.
Finally, the lessons show the importance of intellectual property. European economy has to protect both individual company trademarks and so-called “geographical indications” (e.g. more than 300 geographical indications in the EU are linked to spirits, both Scotch and Irish whiskies as well as Cognac, Polish vodka, Orujo de Galicia and many others). One can say that intellectual property is “monetizing quality”; it is essential for the European economy’s model that industry specializes in the high value tasks of global value chains.
For the European business to gradually adapt to the changing world, an important role belongs to governments in forcing companies understand and prepare for the challenging future.
The EU member states’ governments (and the European Union’s trade policy, in particular) have to facilitate the connections that could bring prosperity back to Europe, argued the Commissioner. That means making sure Europe has an open economy, so that companies that are part of global value chains can gain access to the best quality goods and services from around the world, at the best prices.
For European industry, for which local production and local ingredients are so important, access to internationally traded goods and services does play a role, whether those are capital goods, transport, logistics or finance. That is essential for Europe’s broader competitiveness, as well.
However, in the European economy it is not just political decisions made in the EU that count.
Governments around the world make decisions that affect European business as well, e.g. like levying a discriminatory excise duty or using unfair methods to value goods at the border (e.g. India’s 150% tariff on spirits). And by getting in the way of European exports, they undermine companies’ ability to bring growth back home to Europe.
European Union’s trade policy
The underlying goal of the European Union’s trade policy is to make sure that those decisions are made in a fair and balanced way. There are some priorities in this: the first one is that of the World Trade Organisation, WTO. The multilateral trade system has been through a difficult decade, and the issues at the core of the Doha Round are still not resolved.
But a system that allows the EU to deal with so many partners at the same time – that establishes uniform rules for almost the entire world economy and that is backed up by the world’s best international dispute settlement system must be preserved and expanded.
In December 2013in Bali, WTO members showed they understand this. The deal on trade facilitation reached there will directly benefit several industry sectors while simplifying customs and border procedures across the world. The member states now need to make sure that deal is implemented, and get to work on what remains to be done.
The second priority for EU trade policy is to complete an unprecedented agenda of bilateral free trade agreements. The virtue of these negotiations is two-fold; on the one hand, they allow the EU states to move ahead with opening markets with those countries which are willing, rather than be held back by those who are more reluctant.
This has allowed the Commission to put in place deals with Korea, Columbia, Peru and Latin America. It is what has brought European companies closer to achieving final deals with Canada and Singapore and being engaged in major initiatives with the United States, Japan, India, Mercosur and several ASEAN countries.
This priority of the free trade agreements is important because it allows the EU to go deeper, tackling more of the issues that affect businesses. It also allows the EU to promote the enforcement of intellectual property rights in Latin America and tackle discriminatory technical labeling regulations around the world.
The final priority is enforcement, which is necessary because negotiations have no value if the agreements reached are not put into practice.
As the report highlights, the EU case against the Philippines’ discriminatory excise duties is one example of how the WTO’s dispute settlement system can be very effective. The EU is committed to using that system whenever it is necessary; the EU is also committed to using its trade defence measures when those are required.
These legal tools are complemented by the EU’s Market Access Strategy, which uses all channels of trade diplomacy to help the EU institutions to focus governments’ minds on problems that need to be solved. This approach has allowed to resolve issues around distribution in Vietnam and push for progress where difficulties have arisen in China and Russia.
The EU’s comprehensive strategy is to make sure the European member states are well placed for developing prosperity as the world changes. The Commission is able to put this strategy into practice for as long as the European people understand the way European economy functions with all the benefits from being part of an open global system.
Most people do see that the rise of vast new economic powerhouses is also the rise of vast new markets for European goods and services. But many people also see that globalisation presents challenges for Europe, most of all the need to adapt to rapid changes and deal with new competitors.
As the recent European elections have confirmed, some people wish to react to these challenges by shutting “European doors”. The Commission’s view is that it would be a disaster for the European Union. That means it is very important that people understand how open markets help industries to be successful.
People need to know that shoppers in China and the United States are buying high-quality goods from all across Europe. And they need to know what that means for their local economies.
“It is certainly the role of politicians to tell the whole story”, concluded the Commissioner.
Source: European Commission, Karel De Gucht, European Commissioner for Trade: Speech/14/503 “Thriving in a global economy”, 25 June 2014.
As unemployment rises, another quarter of recession looms for the European economy. On Friday, February 21 some nations reported missing their government deficit targets despite many rounds of spending cuts. The region’s economy is expected to grow later this year, but during the last three years the 17 country union has been the slumps. The Obama administration is concerned about the effect of the European Union’s declining economy on the United States. In his State of the Union Address at the beginning of February 2013, President Obama mentioned free-trade talks with the European Union in an effort to promote American and European trade. The key question is whether such an arrangement will be primarily pursued to address trade issues or whether its main purpose is the foundation of a political counterbalance to China.
As unemployment rises, another quarter of recession may occur in the European economy. On Friday, February 21 some European nations forecasted missing their government deficit targets despite many rounds of spending cuts. The region’s economy is expected to grow later this year, but the 17 country union has spent the last three years in the slumps.
The Obama administration worries how the European Union’s declining economy will affect the United States. President Obama hopes that talks of free-trade with the European Union will promote American and European trade. A key question is whether such an agreement is mainly focused on trade or on developing a political counterbalance to China.